- We now have to include "original programs" from conferences to demonstrate that we actually presented something to get reimbursed. This, at a time when most conferences have switched to electronic only/require payment for programs. This is particularly a problem for students, who don't have the money to cover their credit card bills on top of the time to waste on this merry-go-round with administration.
- We also need to provide "original boarding passes" at a time when most people use their phones or print them out at home. I've taken to printing boarding passes from the self-check in booths, since these are never rejected. When I remember to do so.
- The number of people required to review expense reports (and the large number rejected for stupid things like the above) means that in its attempt to stop fraud, ProdigalU is paying out more than many requested reimbursements in salaries. This was also the case at National Lab.
- We are having some orders rejected by the overseers for buying things like pens, notebooks, and tape, since those things are classified as stationary not research supplies. Because we don't need pens or notebooks in the lab or something.
On the Logistics of Fiction Writing
1 month ago
1 comment:
I don't know what is up with showing "evidence" that we spent the money for research/education purposes; and have to show extraordinary paper trail to show that we did in fact spent it at the right place.
I have had federal grants before; but my account dept is going brezerk. I think it is all to do with increased scrutiny from the feds.
We are not alone. I have at-least 2 other colleagues at two other institutes who are reporting similar things.
Post a Comment